----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Tuesday, June 18,
2013 11:54 AM
Subject:
Re: The Trinity
I read your message some time ago when I received it. I thank you for
taking the time to write and express your views. I do not believe that
Christians are required to respect any holy days. The Apostle Paul said
so himself,
Colossians 2:16 Let no man therefore judge
you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new
moon, or of the sabbath days:
Colossians 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of
Christ.
This is where I draw the line and I ask a simple question, is it sinful
for man to esteem every day alike instead of honoring one day above
another? If it is not sinful, then what is the point? If it is sinful,
then the scriptures say otherwise.
Romans 14:5 One man esteemeth one day
above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully
persuaded in his own mind.
Christ fulfilled the law and abolished it in the cross. Christ came to
fulfill the law, and he DID fulfill it.
Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to
destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to
fulfill.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
"till all be fulfilled" Implies that once all was fulfilled the law
would "pass away" in some respect. Surely, you believe that the animal
sacrifices have passed away? Well, then Christ must have fulfilled all
because not even that could pass away if he had not fulfilled all.
The law is the ministration of Death
because that is ultimately where law leads us. Christ brought something
better for us, that we might obtain the righteousness of God without the
law. For the purpose of making me righteous the laws (specifically the
ten commandments) are abolished.
2 Corinthians 3:7 But if the ministration
of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the
children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the
glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:
2 Corinthians 3:11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much
more that which remaineth is glorious.
2 Corinthians 3:13 And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face,
that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that
which is abolished:
"That which is abolished" and that "which
is done away" refers to the law "written and engraven in stones" This
incident specifically refers to the time when Moses went up to receive
the then commandments and returned with his face glowing from having
been in the presence of God. So there can be no mistaking the subject
of 2 Corinthians 3.
The law is not for me. I cannot become just
by following the law, I become just by following Christ, in the
spirit and not in the letter.
I think it is perfectly acceptable to worship God on Saturn's day,
or Sunday, or Tuesday for that matter. What I object to is any
church that would teach contrary to the teachings of Christ and his
Apostles concerning the Law and which compel and pressure others to
do so.
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini