Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray"
Main Page
"The Teaching's of Arnold Murray Are
Correct and All of the Other Teachings Are False Doctrines"
Question/Comment:
----- Original Message -----
From: Emailer #245
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:55 AM
Do you speak Hebrew or Chaldi? Mr. Murray spent extensive
time living in Israel & befriending, studying w/ ppl. who spoke fluent
Hebrew& Greek. I highly doubt u have done so...it is evident in your
lack of knowledge. The word "Rapture" is not Biblical. Does not exist. if
you were familiar with the org. Text, u would know this. you would
also know that the teaching's of Arnold Murray are correct and
all of the other teachings are false doctrines . Remove the blinders from
your eyes. for the first time in my life the Bible makes sense to me..thank
u Shepherd's Chapel!!!!!! and as far as I'm concerned you are being
judgemental and condescending and I pray that the Lord has mercy on your
soul. But mostly feel sorry for you ....but I will pray for your family, as
I hope you will do the same for mine. I don't need a response from u. Nor do
I want one. I've studied the Bible over 40 years now...& am finally free
from the perversion of false teachers.
My First Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Emailer #245
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:06 PM
Subject: Re:
Hi there,
Thanks for making your opinion known. I
don't know where you got your information, but you get a response
whether you need one or not, that is how it goes. No one has the right
to email another party and demand that they do not respond. If you do
not wish to hear from me, then don't write me, simple. If you write me,
you will get a response, that is my right.
For one, I don't have anything to do with
the rapture doctrine. So I don't know why you would come to me talking
about the rapture nonsense. Arnold Murray is not the only teacher who
knows that the rapture is a false doctrine.
Second, I have studied Arnold Murray's
teachings extensively. He never, ever, claimed to have lived in Israel
nor to have studied Hebrew there. By making this claim you are actually
misrepresenting Arnold Murray and doing him a disservice by passing on
false rumors about his background.
You write me with misrepresentations about
Arnold Murray, and myself, and tell me I'm judgmental? I think you
are a bit judgmental since you didn't even bother to hear what I had to
say, and make all sorts of judgments about me.
Arnold Murray was one of the most perverse
false teachers of them all. He was a con-man who abused the trust of
his students and led them astray perverting the scriptures based on
false claims to scholarship and a selective use of evidence. That is
the truth. You want to defend him, but you don't seem to want to get
your facts straight.
Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and
she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the
LORD.
If you can't see that Cain is Adam's
offspring. That is what I call having
blinders on.
Anyway, since you didn't really want to hear
from me, that is all the time I'm going to give you. But should you need
my assistance, I will be at your service.
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini
Emailer's First Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Emailer #245
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:45 AM
Subject: Re:
As I stated b,,4 u clearly don't know the facts. Last time I
checked there was only one judge and that's God , you come off as an
extremely judgemental person and that's not a very Christian like attitude
you need to check your facts you need to talk to people who have been there
before and you need to watch every video he's ever been in because he does
talk about being in Israel extensively so not misrepresenting anyone.
check your facts sir , you are wrong ,God bless
----- Original Message -----
From: Emailer #245
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:50 AM
Subject: Re:
And if you knew the original text the transliteration
not the translation you would know by stating that Cain is not Adam
son he is Satan's son it is all there in black and white but as I
said in my first email you clearly don't know Hebrew Kaldi or Greek
or you would know these things . you should stop trying to lead
people astray BC you're doing what u say Arnold Murray claimed
to do you're doing exactly what you say he does so you're no better
than he is.
My Second Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Emailer #245
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Re:
Hi again,
As a matter of fact, I have studied Hebrew
and Greek. I just don't go around sounding the trumpet about it, like
Arnold Murray used to. From my studies in Hebrew and Greek I learned
that Arnold Murray was an incompetent scholar. I know that
you have not studied much, because you say
things like this: "if
you knew the original text the transliteration not the translation you
would know by stating that Cain is not Adam son he is Satan's son it is
all there in black and white."
None of that is true, you will never read
any such thing in black and white, no, not in the Hebrew. ...And the
part about translations and transliterations doesn't make
any sense. It sounds like you are using big
words to seem like you know something important. It makes me wonder
just what you think a transliteration is,
and also what it is good for. Transliteration is just switching
the original letters for modern letters. I have several bibles in
Hebrew and also in Greek. The text of Genesis 4:1, which I cited, is
translated accurately. I've done rigorous comparisons of how those words
are used in other contexts. Not merely out of a Strong's Concordance,
but using a Hebrew Concordance, which is more useful when working in
Hebrew.
Arnold Murray had a story he believed in,
and he took advantage of people's ignorance of Hebrew and Greek to get
them to believe as he did. But every time he tries to pronounce a word
in Hebrew or Greek he butchers it badly, and his lack of expertise is
completely exposed. I actually checked him out, as he suggested, and
found out he was a fake. When he said "don't trust this man" he
gained your confidence and exploited it with flatteries. You obviously
did not do a very good job checking him out.
I don't judge men, I judge fruit. I judge
what men DO. I have every right to do
this. It is our DUTY to do it. Murray also judged the fruit of other
men frequently. Christ requires this of us, so there is nothing wrong
with it. You don't like my judgment, you call me judgmental, but you
are judging Arnold Murray also, only you do not judge his fruit, you
judge him personally, you judge the man. You judged that he was a good
man, so you trusted the fruit he produced. That was a mistake, that is
backwards. You shall know them by their fruits.
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini
Emailer's Second Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Emailer #245
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Re:
Goodbye Paul. Agree to disagree. You are sadly as brainwashed
as the " ones" u r quick to point out are. You can continue wasting
your time. I know the truth & it has set me Free , free from. Ppl. Like
yourself.
BTW, I am Greek. Have a feeling that my intimate understanding of that
language is more than a study of words chosen at convince & out of context.
God bless you.
My Third Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Emailer #245
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: Re:
Free from me? That's silly. When were you
in bondage to me? I'm just a former Shepherd's Chapel student. I'm not a
Pastor or anything.
Being intimate with Greek, as you claim, you
should probably already know how Arnold Murray butchered the Greek. For
example when he talked about exapatao.
Does "Expattio!" Really Mean Sexually Seduced?
Or Is Arnold Murray Deceiving Us?
Or are you of another opinion? Do tell. I am not really interested in
persuading you, but there are other people reading my website who will
be persuaded by me, and you, as an expert in Greek, could defend some of
Arnold Murray's claims and possibly refute my arguments.
You see, I have this web site, and all kinds of people come there
looking for information on the Shepherd's Chapel, they will read our
exchange and note how you back down from actually defending Murray. They
will note how you boast big things, but don't seem to be able to
actually refute anything. As an expert in Greek, surely you could set me
straight, in front of everyone, on exapatao. After all, you just
claimed to intimately know Greek. For all the people who come to my site
with questions about Arnold Murray, you could demonstrate that Murray
is 100% correct. I'm waiting...
Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray"
Main Page
|