Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray" Main Page

Who Controls the IMF and Central Banks?

Question/Comment: 

----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: <Paul Stringini>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 3:19 PM
Subject: Who controls the IMF and central banks??

 Just a study you should do before calling out your pastor

Second Message:

Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Who controls the IMF and central banks??
http :// zionistjewfedreserve.com/photo.html
Htp://youtubelink

The First link is now dead, by the domain you can guess what it was about. The second was to a very boring youtube documentary on the New World Order.

My First Response:

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: Who controls the IMF and central banks??
The Jews do what they do based on the sinful nature of man.  It has nothing to do with being the fictional offspring of Satan.  If that is their excuse for doing evil, then what is our excuse?   Hey,  I didn't need to know that Jews controlled the central banks to know that the central banks are evil. 

Emailer's Reply:

----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Who controls the IMF and central banks??
Don't believe all Jews are evil or are the literal offspring of Satan but the direct seed bloodline has to be here.  They're are some as it states that claim to be from the tribe of Judah but are from the synagogue of Satan. But really we all literally have to be from the seed of the fallen nature. Right? With one exception which was Christ. Gods seed he created a women thru her he would come he never knew sin he was the only one with the authority to do so.  Which thru him we all have an opportunity to be redeemed. Never got that from Murray other than that's were they operate! You must admit your learned a great deal from your pastor and I think that we as humans can really just speculate on all the truths of our Fathers word we are all children trying to learn the Logos in a fallen world and we all fall short but we are forgiven thru Christ if Murray fell short which he is a man so I'm sure he did you have to give him credit where credit is due and he did his best knowing full well that judgment starts at the pulpit. 

My Second Response:

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Who controls the IMF and central banks??
Hi, I've been preoccupied.
 
"Don't believe all Jews are evil or are the literal offspring of Satan but the direct seed bloodline has to be here. "
 
The final phrase: "but the direct seed bloodline has to be here" If by this you mean that Satan must have bioligical offspring, then that statement is incorrect.  There is nothing in the scriptures requiring Satan to have biological offspring and there are no scriptures which give support to such an idea.  Yes, one may read that idea into the scriptures.  But that is not the same as saying the bible actually teaches such a thing.
 
"They're are some as it states that claim to be from the tribe of Judah but are from the synagog of Satan."
 
The Jews do not claim to be of the tribe of Judah.  They are the genetic descendants of Judah (and many of the other tribes) The only ones who make "claims" to be literally of the tribes of Israel, and are not, are those who believe in anglo-Israelism such as Arnold Murray, who was neither inwardly a Jew, nor outwardly.
 
The synagogue of Satan is not those who are known to be Jews carnally, the synagogue of Satan is a religious designation.  I don't even like using the word "claim"  when talking about Jews.  Most Jews say they are Jews because that is what they were told all their lives.  To say that they are making some sort of "claim"  is not accurate.  The whole world acknowledges the Jews are the carnal descendants of Israel, and the scriptures agree with this.  Paul taught that a true Jew was not one outwardly but inwardly.  The people whom the world acknowledges are Jews, are Jews outwardly without a doubt.  That is a fact that the Lord himself acknowledged.
 
John 8:37 I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.
 
This is a spiritual problem, not a carnal one.
 
 "But really we all literally have to be from the seed of the fallen nature. Right? "
 
I'm not sure how to read that sentence.  We have a sinful nature.  Yes.
 
With one exception which was Christ. Gods seed he created a women thru her he would come he never knew sin he was the only one with the authority to do so.  Which thru him we all have an opportunity to be redeemed.
 
Not exactly how I'd say it, but no argument.
 
 Never got that from Murray other than that's were they operate!
 
Not sure what you mean.
 
You must admit your learned a great deal from your pastor
 
I'll admit that I learned things from Murray, but most of the big things he teaches I totally reject.  And I think he totally misses some of the most important teachings of the new testament and even rejects many of them. Basically, He gave me reasons and ammunition to speak out against him.  The best he did for me was walk me through all the books in a way I found entertaining. 
 
and I think that we as humans can really just speculate on all the truths of our Fathers word
 
I gotta say, I hear that a lot and I think it is a bit of a cop-out.  Ask and it shall be given you seek and ye shall find.  For unto you it is given to understand the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven. One of the most poisonous aspects of Murray's ministry is that the things he presents as the "truth" are not only untrue, but are also not even useful to believers.  He is a peddler of distractions.  He flatters people and makes them feel good because they know who the Kenites are.  Do you know how God makes me feel good?  He makes me feel good by empowering me with the knowledge that enables a man to walk righteously, soberly and godly in this present world.  He makes me feel good by empowering me to do good.  Murray just fills people's heads with doctrines that cannot profit a man.  he himself teaches that we ought to "leave the tares alone"  so what is the point of knowing about them if you cannot DO anything about them?  But the things God has taught me by his spirit gives me knowledge that I can use.  Things can be done.  There are promises to obtain.  And that is what Christianity is really about.  If you are not profiting in the things of God then I suggest you find a teacher that will give you the tools to obtain those blessings. 
 
 
we are all children trying to learn the Logos in a fallen world and we all fall short but we are forgiven thru Christ
 
I see it more like this, I am a child waiting to be instructed.  I think more trouble comes from "trying to learn the word"  I have a ton of kids, and it is kind of like the little guy gets a screwdriver and he keeps using as a hammer, but I can't teach him unless he cuts it out and starts listening.  Murray was the kind of bible teacher that was so overbearing that he actually dared to teach the bible instead of letting the bible teach him.  I mean that he took that book and crammed his fist into it and made it say what he wanted it to say.  I have no respect for that kind of teacher. 
 
 if Murray fell short which he is a man so I'm sure he did you have to give him credit where credit is due and he did his best knowing full well that judgement starts at the pulpit. 
 
Fell short is not a sufficient term.  He was a false prophet and false teacher, unrepentant.  That is a far cry from "falling short."  Falling short is like the way he says "prime roots" (incorrect) instead of "primitive roots" (correct)  and mispronounces every Greek and Hebrew word he can get his lips around,  but what ruins it for him, is the way he always sounded the trumpet about what a great scholar he was. His overblown pomposity totally ruins it.  By being a strutting rooster all the time, he turns a shortcoming into an glaring error.  And many such like things he did.   He had shortcomings no doubt, but that is not why I find fault with him.
 
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini

Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray" Main Page