Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray"
Main Page
"You
Are Making a Fool Out of Yourself."
Question/Comment:
----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:59 PM
Subject: Emailer #231 Used His Own
Name as the Subject
Your Pastor Arnold Murray obsession is kind of weird and freaky. You are
making a fool out of yourself.
My First Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
Hi Name Withheld,
Thanks for taking the time to write. I
understand my page offends you, and this is your way of lightly lashing
out at me. I am not moved by such appeals to my vanity: "Oh! God
forbid that I should appear to be freaky or weird!" No, I really don't
care what anyone thinks of me. In my opinion, Arnold Murray's obsession
with Kenites and his crude manipulation of the biblical text is more on
the weird freaky side.
I have not updated the Shepherd's Chapel
page on my website in months, having better things to do. So it's hard
for me to take your observations seriously. It's not an obsession, its
just something I do on the side. You look at seven years of side work
and say "Wow, there is a lot of stuff here." But it's just a little
here and a little there in my life. I owe it to the people who study
with Arnold Murray. I do it from a sense of duty. I was once a
student of Shepherd's Chapel. Martin Luther had the Catholic Church,
and I have Arnold Murray, get it? That is where I came from.
Anyways, The only ones being made fools are
the people who attempt to defend Arnold Murray's corrupt teachings. It
is very easy for you to say I'm making a fool of myself. That is very
cheap talk. But you cannot make a fool of me. Give it a try if you
like.
But better yet, I recommend my bible
studies. Why should we talk about Arnold Murray, I've said all I really
care to say about him.
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini
Emailer's First Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
You misunderstood; I wasn't offended. I was just making an observation. I
don't have to "try" to do anything with you. You can't handle the truth
about you being foolish and wasting your time, makes no difference to me.
Good luck, I guess, with your "bible studies". Btw, I believe Christians are
supposed to capitalize the word "Bible".
My Second Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
Does that sound like a sound biblical
principle to you? "If they fail to capitalize the word "Bible" ...they
might not be Christian." That is a very "Kenite" way of making up
religion. Wash the pots and cups, but neglect the weightier matters:
judgment, mercy, and faith. I'm not that kind of Christian. Sometimes
I forget to capitalize things, and sometimes, I misspell things too,
(shock!) but I never really care about stuff like that. I have a very
treacherous keyboard.
When you refer to me "wasting time" It
makes me wonder if you are a passing atheist or something. Because I
could see how an atheist or similar person would characterize what I do
as "time wasting." They would see my efforts as pointless because they
believe there is no God. I can understand why they would feel that
way. Perhaps that was why you were "not offended?"
Supporters of the Shepherd's Chapel would be
more likely to describe my activities as damnable, and self
destructive. That would make sense, I was presuming you were a
believer, but perhaps that was incorrect. A believer would not call
what I do "time wasting." Those who agree with me say "good job" and
those who disagree say "danger!"
My goal is to turn people away from the
Shepherd's Chapel, so I do not waste my time. What I do works. I'm
not trying to destroy the Chapel or to take away all their students.
But I do what I do for the few who can hear me. And hear me they do.
So I am glad to be a fool for their sakes in the eyes of one such as
yourself. I care about people, like I said, appealing to my vanity as
you attempt to do is ineffective. However, my work is effective and I
am pleased with the results. I get many more letters of thanks than I
do letters telling me I'm wasting my time. Most chapel folks think what
I do is diabolical.
So unless you are an atheist, I have to see
your message as a weak passive-aggressive attempt to get under my skin
by a Chapel follower. Fascinating, but ineffective. Your opinion does
not make sense, and expressing it as you do only exposes you as either
an apathetic believer or an unbeliever.
And if it made no difference to you, you
would not have written me.
Thanks for your contribution.
Emailer's Second Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
If you remind me of anyone from the Bible, it is Judas Iscariot. You
somehow decided you are fit to teach, and you even copy the style of the man
you turned on.
Now you have to take guesses at what religion I am? I am glad that you
realize that you make a ton of grammatical errors. You seem to have
sub-Saharan level writing skills.
You are a little defensive; I must have struck a nerve.
My Third Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
Striking nerves seems to be something you
value doing. That is an interesting hobby you have there. So, you like
to hurt people, is that it? If that gives you pleasure, then, by all
means, you may continue to imagine you are hurting me. But I really
don't care what you think you've done to me. I know what I've done, and
I will continue to do it. If it did not offend you (as you claimed),
then you would not talk to me like one who attempts to return an offense.
I guess at your belief's based on the fruit
of your lips. That is how I know you, by what you say to me. It is not
unusual for followers of the Shepherd's Chapel to talk like Atheists. I
have long marveled at the phenomena. Because they know not the true
God, and God is not in them. Therefore they speak ungodly.
It's funny that you apply standards to me
that you do not apply to Murray. Who decided he was fit to
teach? And as for me, since you have not heard me teach, what makes
you fit to judge my teachings?
Line by line bible study is not a style that
Arnold Murray invented or something. Believe me, my "style" of
teaching, is nothing like his. I do not condescend to people and
flatter them with feigned words. I don't toot my own horn all the time
about what a great teacher I am and about all the righteous things I
do. That is Murray's style. He corrupts people with flatteries and
sounds the trumpet before himself about all the good things he claims he
does. Sound the trumpet! Murray is the greatest!
If I am your Judas, than that means Murray
is your Jesus, and that is pretty much how it goes. At least the things
I say about Murray have substance. I take the time to pick apart his
teachings.
I am weird, freaky, and making a fool of
myself. I write like a "sub-Saharan." Are my nerves are "struck" with
this piercing insight? I would laugh, but I've heard it all before. I
get insulted by people like you all the time. You are what the Bible
calls a railer. Slip that shoe on, because it fits right
real snug. In any case,
I still recommend my studies. Maybe if you listened to them you would
have something real to say against me. http://oraclesofgod.org/studies/
Sincerely,
Paul Stringini
Emailer's Third Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231
Used His Own Name as the Subject
As always, everyone of your conjectures and assumptions is off
target. BTW, you DID learn your "teaching" format from Pastor
Murray, whether you admit it or not.
My Fourth Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
So, what? Obviously I value line by line
bible study or I would not have studied with him in the first place.
But I do not use his "style" which is flattery and boast. He flatters
his disciples (and also abuses anyone who might disagree with him, you
know, they are "just a little bit stupid") I don't copy that aspect.
Format, sure, it's a good format. He is not the only one that uses it,
but I certainly heard it first from him.
As far as my conjectures being "off
target." You don't seem to get it. I don't really believe any of the
things I say about you. I don't know you from Adam. I'm just telling
you what YOUR WORDS are communicating to me, So if your words are
giving me the wrong idea. That is entirely your fault. Just as it is
my fault if you think I'm "conjecturing" about you. I have let you
believe that by failing to communicate effectively with you. But that
was not altogether unintentional either, I did not pursue intentional
communication with you since from the beginning your communication has
been nothing but mild insult. And, on that score, I'm 100% correct and
have been all along.
Emailer's Fourth Reply:
----- Original Message -----
From: Name Withheld
To: Paul Stringini
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
So, that's all you got out of anything I said. I indeed waste my own
time.
My Fifth Response:
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stringini
To: Name Withheld
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: Emailer #231 Used His
Own Name as the Subject
I think that is a fair assessment:
"Your Pastor Arnold Murray obsession is kind
of weird and freaky. You are making a fool out of yourself. "
Was I supposed to glean some deep truth out
of that?
Return to "The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray"
Main Page
|