Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God is
come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that
is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus
Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.
What can be said of the nature of God, especially of Jesus Christ?
His name is the one name whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12)
1Timothy 1:17 Now unto the King eternal, immortal,
invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever.
Amen.
God has often been said to be "invisible" and that, "No man
hath seen God at any time."
John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only
begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
On the other hand, there have been several occasions on which
God has been seen.
Exodus 33:20 "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall
no man see me, and live...23...thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall
not be seen. "
Can God's face be seen, or not?
Genesis 32:30 And Jacob called the name of the place
Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.
Jacob saw God's face and expected that he should have died, and
the Lord himself told Moses that "No man," could see his face and live (I don't
care what anyone says, God makes exceptions)
Judges 6:22 And when Gideon perceived that he was an
angel of the LORD, Gideon said, Alas, O Lord GOD! for because I have seen an
angel of the LORD face to face. 23 And the LORD said unto him, Peace be
unto thee; fear not: thou shalt not die.
If there was any question whether the term "an angel of the
Lord" refers to God himself, this passage makes it clear. When verse 23
begins, "And the Lord," the term Lord is, "YHVH," the ancient name of God, so
clearly here, Gideon has seen YHVH, God to the face. Here God preempts
Gideon and assures him, "thou shalt not die."
That leaves us in a bit of a mystery. I purposely left out
some of what God said to Moses in Exodus 33.
Exodus 33:20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for
there shall no man see me, and live. 21 And the LORD said, Behold, there is a
place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock: 22 And it shall come to pass,
while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of
the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: 23 And I will take
away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.
2Corinthians 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to
shine out of darkness, hath shined in our
hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in
the face of Jesus Christ.
In the face of Jesus Christ is given the knowledge of the Glory
of God, the glory which Moses was shielded from as God passed by.
Hebrews 1:3 Who being the brightness of his glory,
and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word
of his power,
Again, God is invisible, he cannot be seen. Jesus Christ
is God in visible form. Which one do you suppose Moses saw the back of?
I have never read anywhere of the Father being seen, as a person, in any
capacity (Jesus Christ did see the Spirit descend in a visible form)
This was ignorance. The Father has
been seen. I just happened to miss it, being blinded by the traditions
taught me. I have often said that there are many people who know a lot more
about the bible than I do. The Holy Spirit sometimes teaches us
directly, but He also teaches us at the mouth of other believers. But they
will speak as the scripture speaks, and someone spoke these scriptures to
me. (I still stand by what I have said, that God, in his essence,
is not visible. But that is not to say that the Father cannot take
form as the father distinct from the form of the Son. Just as the
voice of the Father can speak from heaven, though the son of God is said to
be the word of God.)
Daniel 7:13 I saw in the night
visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of
heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before
him.
John 5:37 And the Father himself,
which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his
voice at any time, nor seen his shape.
At first I thought, "This does not
imply he has a shape." But it does, because He has a voice. And, at first,
it occurred to me to suggest that Christ being the word of God is the voice
of God... But then I remembered the voice that spake from heaven, "This is
my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased." So if the Father has a voice,
then this passage also implies he has a shape.
And this scripture testifies to the same thing.
John 12:28 Father, glorify thy name.
Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and
will glorify it again.
The Father can take shape. I was
putting God in a box, just like I always tell myself not to.
Colossians 1:13 ..his dear Son... 15 Who is the
image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Jesus Christ is the image of that which cannot be seen, of that
which it would kill you to see. Interestingly, he is also called the
"firstborn of every creature." Which implies that he is a creature,
created by God
When I said "implies" I should
have said "seems to imply." I do not believe that Jesus Christ is a
creature. Nor do I believe that this passage implies any such thing.
Christ is uncreated (as I did go on to explain later in the original writing
which I have not altered, nor will). I wrote this way, at the time
this was written, because the church I was in at the time saw Christ as a
created. I was trying to be diplomatic, something I am often guilty
of, but I love the people of that Church and some of them are easily
offended. But in my desire to be diplomatic, I made this sound wrong.
There is probably more in this document that I need to reexamine, and will.
Also, Christ is firstborn by
appointment, not by generation. This concept is seen in the following
scriptures:
Psalm 89:26 He shall cry unto
me, Thou art my father, my God, and the rock of my salvation.
Psalm 89:27 Also I will make him my firstborn, higher than the kings of the
earth.
I Chronicles 5:1 Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was
the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright
was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the genealogy is
not to be reckoned after the birthright.
I Chronicles 5:2 For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the
chief ruler; but the birthright was Joseph's:)
When I originally wrote this,
it was intended to guide people to the conclusion that Christ was not a
created being (which one can see if one continues to read this writing). I
remember asking my pastor at the time to read this, and I was surprised that
he seemed to think nothing ill of it... perhaps my language was too
diplomatic... Perhaps I failed to show him what I wanted him to see.
When we read scriptures that
say Christ is "the beginning of the creation of God," and, "the
firstborn of every creature," it is not unexpected that people will think
"he is a creature." And I have affirmed the scriptures which seem to
say so because it is acceptable to repeat that Jesus is what the scriptures
say he is. But, as I go on to show, Christ has no beginning,
which makes the idea that he is a creature, according to the common
understanding of the term, impossible. Christ comes from God, yet he
has no beginning.
Revelation3:14 ...These things saith the Amen, the
faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;
A second witness. Yet, surely, Jesus Christ is divine.
Let's continue in Colossians:
Again, these were passages relied on
by some to say that Christ had a beginning. My intent is to lead you
away from that conclusion. At the time, I felt I needed to be subtle,
because I wanted people to hear me and keep loving me. But it is best to state
things plainly and clearly. Something I strive to do.
Colossians 1:16 For by him were all things created, that
are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be
thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by
him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the
firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. 19
For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
There is a sort of dual implication here, on the one hand the
Son is (seemingly) spoken of as being creature
(again, the point of saying it like that was to
reduce resistance from the people I had in mind when I wrote this originally)
, and, in such a state, as having been creator
of all other things. And verse 19 seems to be saying that he is under the
authority of the Father, who, by implication, has caused all this fullness to
dwell in him.
Hebrews 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers
manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these
last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things,
by whom also he made the worlds; 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and
the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his
power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the
Majesty on high; 4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by
inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
There is a lot said there. But notable are these
facts, Jesus Christ was appointed heir, he has obtained his current position by
inheritance. Jesus himself declared that he was not equal to God.
John 14:28 ... for my Father is greater than I.
Yet, on the other hand, this is written of Christ:
Philippians 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also
in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery
to be equal with God:
What exactly does it mean to be "in the form of" God. Form
is "morphe" and it means shape. And he thought it not "robbery"
to be equal with Him.
Usually this is interpreted to mean that he did not see equality with God as
something that he needed to take hold of. (It was previously stated as his
birthright, his inheritance.) So this means that he was equal with God.
Philippians 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and
took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8
And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient
unto death, even the death of the cross.
Looking at it in context, this scripture is clearly saying that Jesus Christ
was equal to God, he was in God's form, and needed not to steal Godhood.
These divine characteristics were not a barrier to him humbling himself and
becoming a man.
But what does the Father say of all this?
Hebrews 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne,
O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the
sceptre of thy kingdom. 9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated
iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of
gladness above thy fellows. 10 And (unto the Son he saith) ,
Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth;
and the heavens are the works of thine hands: 11 They shall perish; but
thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment; 12 And as a
vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the
same, and thy years shall not fail.
According to Hebrews, the Father calls the Son, "God," and even,
"Lord." Yet still, the Son says, "My Father is greater than I."
A Key From Melchisedek:
This is a person in the bible who, it has been suggested,
may
have been the pre-incarnate Christ:
Hebrews 7:1 For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest
of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings,
and blessed him; 2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by
interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which
is, King of peace;
Paul does not at any time declare that this "Melchisedec" is
Christ, still, if we look at the things that are said of Melchisedec, they
are very revealing as to the nature of the Son of God:
Hebrews 7:3 Without father, without mother, without
descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto
the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.
Having no beginning of days? Above, it was implied that the Son of
God was the beginning of God's creation. Yet here this Melchisedec is
said to have have no beginning at all. As doesn't someone else...
Important Note: "but made like unto the Son of God."
That is the key here, Paul is comparing the Son of God to Melchisedec, and you
can argue all day whether or not Melchisedec is indeed Christ. The point
is that Melchisedec is like the Son of God, in that he has
neither beginning nor end. So this is also saying
that the Son of God has neither beginning nor end, yet he proceeds, and
comes forth from the Father, he is the beginning and first born, implying a
start, yet declared to have no beginning at all.
I think of it like this:
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God.
Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in
blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
Jesus Christ is God, because Jesus Christ is the word of God,
the word of God comes out of God and is secondary to God, (there is an almost
"father-son" relationship between a person and the words he speaks) yet the word
is no mere by-product of God or something less than God ("the Word was God") and
God honors his word above all else, and his word is that which does everything
God does, in His Word is power, honor, glory, and the word of God is also
delivered by the Spirit of God.
Man begins to speak when he is very young, we have our, "First
words." But God does not have a beginning. So can the Word of God be
ever said to have a beginning? Was God ever dumb? God forbid, no, the word of
God has no beginning. It is the beginning of
everything. Yet it is a creation of God. Yet it is as much God as God
himself because God himself has declared it so to be. In my opinion, this
is a clue to the exact nature of the father-son relationship.
Preliminary Conclusion:
So, concluding, we see that Jesus Christ is declared by the
scriptures to be God, yet he was also a man, created, yet, a the Son of God, without beginning.
He
is the beginning of creation, firstborn of creatures, appointed, by inheritance,
to be God. (Just scroll up for all the scripture references for every
phrase of that statement).
The Son of God seems to me to have the most revealed about him,
and that is as it should be because the knowledge of Him is what saves us. God has given him preeminence, we look to
him, he is the "brightness of his glory," and "the express image of his person,"
the "image of the invisible God." Jesus Christ is the focus.
I Corinthians 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of
darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of
the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
On the Nature Of the Father-Son Relationship. (And what
of the Spirit?)
If there is a Son, there must be a Father, but what is the
exact nature of that relationship? I see that there is a
distinction between the Father and the Son, and there is a
lack of distinction between the Father and the Son. I don't approve of
characterizing the distinction (or lack thereof) beyond what the scriptures
reveal. I think that is where all the trouble comes from, people want
simplified explanations, that iron out all the profound aspects of God.
They want their God described in ten words or less. That is
error, I'd rather just stick with what is written.
I use the word "distinction" because I need a word to
characterize the information I can gain from the scriptures without adding
meaning to the scriptures. I would rather not use any words which I do
not find in the scriptures, still, since the scriptures themselves do not
attempt to place a general label on the facts concerning these
relationships, I have taken a minimalist approach and chosen, very
carefully, a word which does not bring intrusive ideas into the discussion
of the information actually contained in scripture.
The Son as distinct from the Father:
Hebrews 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O
God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy
kingdom. 9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God,
even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
It is clear from this passage, and others like it, that the
Son is distinct from the Father. There exists a father-son
relationship between Jesus Christ and God. Not merely a name
distinction, but a real distinction by which they interact with one another.
This distinction has its big moments and small, but the fact that God even
uses the ideas "father" and "son" creates a distinction immediately because
those words have to signify something, therefore the distinction between the
Father and the Son is observed all throughout the New Testament.
The Son as indistinct from the Father:
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born,
unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his
shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty
God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Even though, Jesus Christ is distinct from God, his Father,
Christ is also spoken of on several occasions as though he were
one-and-the-same with the Father, as if there was no distinction between
them at all.
John 14:8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the
Father, and it sufficeth us. 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long
time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen
me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
The following verse is speaking of Christ and exemplifies
this lack of distinction:
Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the
Godhead bodily.
Distinct or Indistinct?
The principal errors that people make are in either denying
that the Father and the Son are distinct or in denying that they are
indistinct. This can be seen all over Christianity these days, as well
as throughout history in various heresies and in the so-called orthodoxy.
Men want to say one way or the other, or whip up a catch-all phrase, but God has not really given it to
us in the word like that.
What of the Spirit?
The Same is true of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit is spoken of
as distinct from the Father and the Son, and the Spirit is spoken of as
indistinct from the Father and the Son.
The Spirit as distinct from the Father and the Son:
Matthew 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up
straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and
he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: 17
And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am
well pleased.
The voice came from heaven, not from his shoulder, if the
Father is indistinct from the Spirit then this passage is highly misleading.
John 1:33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me
to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see
the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which
baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
So John the Baptist, at least, also witnessed the descent
of the Spirit.
John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost,
whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and
bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
The father sends the Holy Ghost in the name of Christ.
If the Father is indistinct from the Holy Ghost, then should we read this
passage: "But the Comforter, which is the Father, whom the
Father shall send in my name...?" That would be kind of like saying,
"For God so loved the world that he sent himself." Instead of saying,
"his only begotten Son" (John 3:16)
John 15: 26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will
send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which
proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
The Father does not send himself, he sends his Spirit (and yet God
is defined as being a Spirit [John 4:23]), he also sends his Son (here Jesus speaks of sending the Spirit
himself, this can be viewed as another example of the indistinctness between
Father and Son), these both come forth from the Father.
The Spirit as distinct from the Father, yet
indistinct from
the Son:
Jesus came in the name of the Father, he never came in his own
name, but the Holy Spirit does come in the name of Jesus Christ, and is in
fact, at times, spoken of as indistinct from Jesus Christ (that partly
explains why
people speak of having Jesus Christ "inside them").
Galatians 4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent
forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
God did not "send himself into your hearts," he sends the
Spirit of His son, yet previously Jesus had spoken of the Spirit as distinct
from himself, as had been witnessed at his baptism. The Spirit of God within us is even said here to make
our nature like that of son's, compelling us to cry to God, as a son would, "Abba," which
is an Aramaic word which means, "Father."
The Spirit as distinct from the Son, yet
indistinct from
the Father:
John 4:23 (The Son speaking) But the hour cometh, and
now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in
truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit:
and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I
myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see
me have.
So we see here that the son can be shown as distinct from the
Father and the Holy Spirit and The Holy Spirit and the father can be
presented as indistinguishable.
The Spirit as indistinct from the Father or the Son:
John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man
love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will
come unto him, and make our abode with him.
Here it is said that the presence of the Spirit in the
believer is tantamount to the presence of the Father and the Son together in
the believer, so that no real distinction between the two of them and
the Spirit is seen. The spirit dwells in the believer and that is
treated here as the same as having both the Father and the Son dwelling in
the believer.
The Spirit as indistinct from the Son:
Colossians 1:16 For by him were all things created,
that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether
they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were
created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by
him all things consist.
Genesis 1:2 ...And the Spirit of God moved upon the
face of the waters.
In the new testament it is made clear that Jesus is the
creator of all things, but in Genesis it is clear that the Spirit of God, is
what is said to be acting on creation. This again, blurs the distinction
between the Son of God and the Spirit of God.
The Father, the Son, and The Spirit as all distinct
from One
Another:
Romans 8:26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our
infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but
the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot
be uttered.
To intercede is to act as a "go-between" A
go-between cannot be a no-between, i,e.an intercessor must act between
two parties, neither of which are him. If the Father and the
Spirit were one-and-the same then the Spirit would be acting as an
intercessor to himself. The Spirit is distinct from the Father in
that he acts as intercessor on behalf of the saints, as is Christ:
Jeremiah 17:10 says "I the LORD search the heart, I
try the reins," In Revelation, Jesus lays claim to this power.
Revelation 2:23 ...and all the churches shall know that I am he
which searcheth the reins and hearts
Romans 8:27 And he that searcheth the hearts
knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession
for the saints according to the will of God.
It makes sense to interpret this "searcher" as Jesus,
because it also says that the reason he knows the mind of the spirit is
because he (Jesus) acts as intercessor for the saints according to the
will of God.
So, Romans 8:26 & 8:27, because he makes
intercession for the saints, Christ knows the mind of the Spirit, and
the Spirit makes intercession as well, but the son and the spirit are
distinct here, because of the phrase "he (Jesus)...knoweth the mind of
the Spirit)
If the searcher is the Father in verse 27, then the "he" in "he maketh
intercession" must be the spirit.
However one looks at it, there is a definite distinction being drawn
here. There are go-betweens going between God and man. The
Father, the Son, and the Spirit as totally indistinct from
One
Another: I Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between
God and men, the man Christ Jesus; We already established that both the
Spirit and the Son make intercession to God on our behalf. Here Paul
the Apostle states that there is only one mediator between God and man,
making no distinction between the Son and the Spirit, add to that the fact
that God is a spirit, which already blurs that distinction, and then
consider this: Galatians 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but
God is one.
God is one. A mediator, by definition, mediates between two parties.
Also, a mediator, by definition, cannot be one of the two parties which he
is acting as mediator between. A go-between cannot exist when there is
no-between. But God is one. In Galatians 3:20 I believe Paul is
acknowledging this paradox.
Conclusion:
So we see from these scriptures (and there are, in some cases,
more examples in scripture than I have listed) that there is distinction
between Father, and Son, and Spirit. And we also observe a lack of
distinction between the same. Some people like to draw certain
conclusions from these facts. I just accept the fact. This is
the God declared to me in the scriptures.
There are many ways in which one might try to make all these scriptures
in to a form which would be acceptable to man (or some men), but all such
attempts are going to fail to capture the fullness of one that fills Heaven
and Earth and is not contained by them. And such constructs are
completely unnecessary. I accept all the scriptures I have
presented and have reconciled them in faith.
I hope this has been enlightening to those who are curious as to
my mind on this subject. A closing thought to ponder:
I've never heard anything but conjecture about the following
scriptures, and that is probably all I will ever hear from man regarding
them. Revelation 3:1
These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God...
Revelation 4:5 And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and
thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning
before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.
Revelation 5:6 And I beheld, and,
lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst
of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and
seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into
all the earth.
|